The New Standard in Technical Hiring

Evaluate Engineering Skill
The Way Engineers Work

Through code review, not whiteboards. Measure judgment and architectural thinking. Not pressure performance.

5 min

setup time

40-50%

less overhead

80-90%

less friction

Request Early Access

Code Review Interviews Work.
But They Don't Scale.

Code generation tests miss what matters: reasoning and judgment. Manual code review interviews capture the right signal. The problem is they take forever to set up.

Read why your current interviews are giving you the wrong signal

3-5 hours per interview design

Building the repo, constructing change sets, writing rubrics. All before the first interview even happens.

90% of candidates hit friction

What if a candidate doesn't have a GitHub or GitLab account? Many interviews degrade to verbal walkthroughs.

10-50% variance across interviewers

Every interviewer runs a session differently. Different rubrics, different expectations. The same candidate gets wildly different scores.

$80K-$420K per mis-hire

100% of temp-to-hire failures were detectable via code review, according to teams using the approach manually.

Entrevue Makes Code Review Scalable

Code review is the most predictive signal. Entrevue makes it repeatable. Fast to set up. Easy for candidates. Consistent across your entire team.

Faster

Setup under 5 minutes with curated templates

3-5 hours → <5 minutes for first-time interview setup

Clearer

Structured context and annotated change sets

~50% fewer clarification interruptions during interviews

More Fair

Standardized rubrics and scoring

~20% more consistent evaluations across teams

More Accessible

Zero setup for candidates. Click and start.

80-90% less friction compared to GitHub/GitLab-based reviews

How Entrevue Works

From setup to evaluation in minutes, not hours

Choose a Template

Pick a template built for your role. Change sets and rubrics are ready. Start interviewing in under five minutes.

Result: What used to take 3-5 hours now takes less than 5 minutes

Invite the Candidate

Send a link. Candidates open it and they're in. No GitHub account. No login friction.

Result: 80-90% reduction in candidate setup friction and technical issues

Conduct the Interview

Everything in one place. Inline comments, structured notes, clear context. No jumping between tabs or tools.

Result: 40-50% reduction in per-candidate interview overhead

Make Better Decisions

Your structured notes export directly to your applicant tracking system (ATS). Competency scores map to your internal rubrics.

Result: Higher consistency and confidence in hiring decisions

The Business Case

Even a 10% reduction in mis-hires pays for Entrevue many times over

Cost of a Bad Hire

Industry research shows a mis-hire typically costs 0.5x-2x annual salary once you include onboarding, lost productivity, rework, and restarting the search. For senior full-stack engineers earning $160K-$210K, that's $80K-$420K per mistake.

$60K-$180K

Average temp-to-hire failure cost

Onboarding costs, lost productivity, and starting the search over

100%

Detectable via code review

Teams report all temp-to-hire failures showed signals code review would have caught

The ROI is clear:

One prevented bad hire pays for years of Entrevue. Everything else is upside: better decisions, faster loops, less burden on your team.

Pilot Program

Partner With Us in a Real Hiring Cycle

We're working with a small group of teams who want to try code-review based interviewing in a real hiring cycle. Setup is quick, and we shape the scenario around the role you're hiring for.

There's no cost to join. We simply ask for honest feedback.

If your team wants clearer signal with less interview overhead, we'd be glad to include you.

Join the Pilot Program

Ready to Hire Differently?

We're onboarding teams carefully. If you're serious about better hiring, let's talk.